LSHSS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


LSHSS Papers in Press
Published online September 15, 2009

Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 2009; doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2009/08-0002)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text ([PDF])
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berninger, V. W.
Right arrow Articles by Amtmann, D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berninger, V. W.
Right arrow Articles by Amtmann, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Relationship of Word- and Sentence-Level Working Memory to Reading and Writing in Second, Fourth, and Sixth Grade

Virginia W. Berninger
Robert D. Abbott

University of Washington

H. Lee Swanson
University of California Riverside

Dan Lovitt
Pam Trivedi
Shin-Ju (Cindy) Lin
Laura Gould
Marci Youngstrom
Shirley Shimada
Dagmar Amtmann

University of Washington

Correspondence to first author at 322 Miller, Box 353600, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-3600, vwb{at}u.washington.edu, or 206-616-6311 (fax).

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the contribution of working memory at the word-level and the sentence-level of language to reading and writing outcomes.

Method: Measures of reading, writing, and working memory at the word and sentence levels were administered to second (N = 122), fourth (N = 222), and sixth (N = 105) graders. Structural equation modeling was used to evaluate whether the two predictor working memory factors contributed unique variance beyond their shared covariance to each of five outcome factors: handwriting, spelling, composing, word reading, and reading comprehension.

Results: At each grade level, except for handwriting and composition in sixth grade, the word-level working memory factor contributed unique variance to each reading and writing outcome. The text-level working memory factor contributed unique variance to reading comprehension in fourth and sixth grade.

Discussion: The clinical significance of these findings for assessment and intervention is discussed.

KEY WORDS: Working Memory, Levels of Language, Orthographic, Phonological, Reading, Writing


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.