|
|
||||||||
Article |
University of California Riverside
University of Washington
Correspondence to first author at 322 Miller, Box 353600, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-3600, vwb{at}u.washington.edu, or 206-616-6311 (fax).
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the contribution of working memory at the word-level and the sentence-level of language to reading and writing outcomes.
Method: Measures of reading, writing, and working memory at the word and sentence levels were administered to second (N = 122), fourth (N = 222), and sixth (N = 105) graders. Structural equation modeling was used to evaluate whether the two predictor working memory factors contributed unique variance beyond their shared covariance to each of five outcome factors: handwriting, spelling, composing, word reading, and reading comprehension.
Results: At each grade level, except for handwriting and composition in sixth grade, the word-level working memory factor contributed unique variance to each reading and writing outcome. The text-level working memory factor contributed unique variance to reading comprehension in fourth and sixth grade.
Discussion: The clinical significance of these findings for assessment and intervention is discussed.
KEY WORDS: Working Memory, Levels of Language, Orthographic, Phonological, Reading, Writing
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| All ASHA Journals | AJA | AJSLP | JSLHR | LSHSS |