LSHSS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


LSHSS Papers in Press
Published online August 24, 2009

Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 2009; doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2009/08-0085)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text ([PDF])
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hwa-Froelich, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Matsuo, H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hwa-Froelich, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Matsuo, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Communication development and differences in children adopted from China and Eastern Europe

Deborah A. Hwa-Froelich
Hisako Matsuo

Saint Louis University

Send correspondence to: Deborah A. Hwa-Froelich, Ph.D., 3750 Lindell Blvd.; 12 McGannon Hall, St. Louis, MO 63108-3412, Phone: (314) 977-3380, FAX: (314) 977-3360, E-mail: hwafroda{at}slu.edu.

Purpose: The communication development of children adopted from China and Eastern Europe were compared by region of origin at 6 and 12 months post-adoption.

Method: Twenty children, recruited prior to or immediately following their adoption, were included to participate in the study. Measures were collected between 2 and 6 months post-adoption (Time 1) and then at 12 to 14 months post-adoption (Time 2). Ages ranged between 11–22 months and 22–34 months respectively. Parent reported vocabulary comprehension and expression and behavioral communication assessments were administered.

Results: No significant differences between region of origin were found at Time 1. At Time 2 all of the children performed within 2 standard deviations of the mean on the PLS-4. Significant group differences in expressive language performance were found at Time 2 with children adopted from Eastern Europe and China demonstrating different patterns of English language development.

Conclusion: Early prelinguistic measures may provide prognostic indicators for later English language development. Children adopted from different countries where they are initially exposed to different birth languages may acquire English differently.

KEY WORDS: internationally adopted children, English language development, regional differences


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.