Article |
National Center for Evidence-Based Practice in Communication Disorders
Western Michigan University
University of South Florida
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction & University of North Carolina Greensboro
Macomb Intermediate School District
Kansas State Department of Education, Retired
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Corresponding author: Frank M. Cirrin, Minneapolis Public Schools/Special Education, 425 5th St. NE, Minneapolis, MN 55413. E-mail: fcirrin{at}mpls.k12.mn.us.
Purpose: The purpose of this investigation was to conduct an evidence-based systematic review (EBSR) of peer-reviewed articles from the last 30 years about the effect of service delivery model on speech-language intervention outcomes for elementary school-age students.
Method: A computer search was conducted of electronic databases to identify studies that addressed any of 16 research questions. Structured review procedures were used to select and evaluate data based studies that used experimental designs of the following types: randomized clinical trials, non-randomized comparison studies, and single-subject design studies.
Results: This EBSR revealed a total of 5 studies that met review criteria and addressed questions of the effectiveness of pullout, classroom-based, and indirect consultative service delivery models with elementary school-age children. Some evidence suggests that classroom-based direct services are at least as effective as pullout intervention for some intervention goals, and that highly trained SLP assistants, using SLP-prepared manuals to guide intervention, can provide effective services for some children with language problems.
Conclusions: Lacking adequate research-based evidence, clinicians must rely on reason-based practice and their own data until more data become available about which service delivery models are most effective. Recommendations are made for an expanded research agenda.
KEY WORDS: Service delivery models, pullout, classroom-based, indirect-consultative, evidence-based practice
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. L. Bellon-Harn Dose frequency: Comparison of language outcomes in preschool children with language impairment Child Language Teaching and Therapy, June 1, 2012; 28(2): 225 - 240. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Steele and M. T. Mills Vocabulary intervention for school-age children with language impairment: A review of evidence and good practice Child Language Teaching and Therapy, October 1, 2011; 27(3): 354 - 370. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Brandel and D. Frome Loeb Program Intensity and Service Delivery Models in the Schools: SLP Survey Results Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, October 1, 2011; 42(4): 461 - 490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||