|
|
||||||||
Article |
Purpose: This article proposes some recommendations to enable clinicians to balance doubt and certainty when evaluating the currency and effectiveness of their treatment approaches.
Method: I offer the following advice: (1) Question the authority of the information previously learned earlier in one's career; (2) be cognizant of what we do not yet know about best clinical practice; (3) understand that knowledge of "best practices" is both temporary and relative; (4) enable access to new information by the use of electronic alerts; (5) be flexible in reading new clinical reports, keeping an open mind as to their value; (6) get the clinically-relevant details of new approaches by reading the full reports; and (7) employ and then, evaluate the outcomes of new approaches used in treating individuals on our caseload.
Results: Examples are provided to show that pro-active participation in research-alert programs can enable clinicians to access emerging, clinically-relevant information, some of which is controversial. Staying abreast of such information is more efficient than performing guided searches for information as challenging cases arise.
Conclusions: Applications of these recommendations should enable practicing clinicians to entertain new, clinically-useful concepts, while not taxing the limited time that clinicians typically have to engage in continuing education.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| All ASHA Journals | AJA | AJSLP | JSLHR | LSHSS |