LSHSS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools Vol.13 121-128 April 1982.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stalnaker, L. D.
Right arrow Articles by Creaghead, N. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stalnaker, L. D.
Right arrow Articles by Creaghead, N. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

An Examination of Language Samples Obtained under Three Experimental Conditions

Louise D. Stalnaker
Nancy A. Creaghead

Language samples were obtained from 12 Head Start preschool children under the following three experimental conditions: Condition I, Retelling a Story with Toys; Condition II, Playing with Toys; Condition III, Toys with Questions. The quantity and quality of the three samples gathered from each child were compared by analyzing the total number of utterances, the proportion of the total utterances which were sentence fragments, the number of transformations and adverbial expansions, the number of different semantic relationships, and the mean length of utterance (MLU). Results indicated that retelling a story produced the largest MLU, but toys and questions produced more utterances. These findings indicated that questioning children does not inhibit their language and asking them to retell a story may be a fruitful approach to use when gathering a language sample.

Submitted on July 31, 1980
Accepted on January 28, 1981


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 AJSLPHome page
L. M. Justice, R. P. Bowles, J. N. Kaderavek, T. A. Ukrainetz, S. L. Eisenberg, and R. B. Gillam
The Index of Narrative Microstructure: A Clinical Tool for Analyzing School-Age Children's Narrative Performances.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, May 1, 2006; 15(2): 177 - 191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JSLHRHome page
S. Miles, R. Chapman, and H. Sindberg
Sampling Context Affects MLU in the Language of Adolescents With Down Syndrome.
J Speech Lang Hear Res, April 1, 2006; 49(2): 325 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication Disorders QuarterlyHome page
E. I. Burroughs and S. E. Murray
The Influence of Play Material on Discourse During Play
Communication Disorders Quarterly, January 1, 1992; 14(2): 119 - 128.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Language TestingHome page
R. B. Simms and D. J. Richgels
The syntactic density score revisited: which of its components matter in the oral language of 9-15 year olds?
Language Testing, June 1, 1986; 3(1): 39 - 53.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.