|
|
||||||||
Five factors are identified as contributing to the lack of efficacy in the management of a language-disordered child. The fragmentation of language into discrete points during testing and therapy, therapist bias, acquiescence, lack of follow-up, and bureaucratic policies and procedures are found to contribute to this therapeutic failure. Solutions to each of these contributing factors are discussed.
Submitted on October 8, 1986
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. L. Lof and M. M. Watson A Nationwide Survey of Nonspeech Oral Motor Exercise Use: Implications for Evidence-Based Practice Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, July 1, 2008; 39(3): 392 - 407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. K. O'Neill, M. J. Pearce, and J. L. Pick Preschool Children's Narratives and Performance on the Peabody Individualized Achievement Test - Revised: Evidence of a Relation between Early Narrative and Later Mathematical Ability First Language, June 1, 2004; 24(2): 149 - 183. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. B. Katz Clinical Decision Making as an Ethnographic Process Communication Disorders Quarterly, January 1, 1990; 13(1): 93 - 99. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASHA Journals | AJA | AJSLP | JSLHR | LSHSS |