Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools Vol.27 16-20 January 1996.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrowCustom Print
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berg, F. S.
Right arrow Articles by Benson, P. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Berg, F. S.
Right arrow Articles by Benson, P. V.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Delicious   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Classroom Acoustics

The Problem, Impact, and Solution

Frederick S. Berg 1
James C. Blair 1

Peggy V. Benson 1
1 Utah State University, Logan

Classroom acoustics are generally overlooked in American education. Noise, echoes, reverberation, and room modes typically interfere with the ability of listeners to understand speech. The effect of all of these acoustical parameters on teaching and learning in school needs to be researched more fully. Research has shown that these acoustical problems are commonplace in new as well as older schools, and when carried to an extreme, can greatly affect a child's ability to understand what is said (Barton, 1989; Blair, 1990; Crandell, 1991; Finitzo, 1988). The precise reason for overlooking these principles needs to be studied more fully. Recently, however, acoustic principles have been clarified, and technologies for measuring room acoustics and providing sound systems have become available to solve many of the acoustical problem in classrooms (Berg, 1993; Brook, 1991; D'Antonio, 1989; Davis & Davis, 1991; Davis & Jones, 1989; Eargle, 1989; Egan, 1988; Everest, 1987, 1989; Foreman, 1991; Hedeen, 1980). This article describes parameters of the problem, its impact on students and teachers, and four possible solutions to the problem. These solutions are noise control, signal control without amplification, individual amplification systems, and sound field amplification systems.

KEY WORDS: classrooms, acoustics, listening

Submitted on July 12, 1994
Accepted on March 2, 1995


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BMJ OpenHome page
K. Persson Waye, I. van Kamp, and L. Dellve
Validation of a questionnaire measuring preschool children's reactions to and coping with noise in a repeated measurement design
BMJ Open, May 23, 2013; 3(5): e002408 - e002408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Environment and BehaviorHome page
J. Kristiansen, R. Persson, S. P. Lund, H. Shibuya, and P. M. Nielsen
Effects of Classroom Acoustics and Self-Reported Noise Exposure on Teachers' Well-Being
Environment and Behavior, February 1, 2013; 45(2): 283 - 300.
[Abstract] [PDF]