LSHSS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools Vol.27 215-230 July 1996.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gierut, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Rowland, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gierut, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Rowland, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Phonological Treatment Efficacy and Developmental Norms

Judith A. Gierut 1
Michele L. Morrisette 1
Mary T. Hughes 1

Susan Rowland 1

1 Indiana University, Bloomington

The efficacy of teaching sounds in developmental sequence as defined by age norms was evaluated in two independent investigations. Study I was a within-subject evaluation using an alternating treatments design, with three children each receiving treatment on one early-acquired and one later-acquired phoneme relative to chronological age. Study II was an across-subject evaluation involving six children in a staggered multiple baseline paradigm, whereby three subjects were each taught one early-acquired sound and three other subjects were taught one later-acquired sound relative to chronological age. Phonological change was measured on probes of sounds excluded from each child's phonemic inventory.

General results indicated that: (a) quantitatively, change in treated phonemes and manner classes was equivocal following treatment of early-acquired and later-acquired phonemes; (b) qualitatively, the onset of change was immediate following treatment of later-acquired phonemes, but delayed following treatment of early-acquired phonemes; and (c) treatment of later-acquired phonemes led to system-wide changes in untreated sound classes, whereas treatment of early-acquired phonemes did not. These findings were considered relative to clinical intervention and theories of phonological acquisition.

KEY WORDS: phonological disorders, phonological treatment, treatment efficacy, developmental norms

Submitted on August 10, 1994
Accepted on July 11, 1995


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AJSLPHome page
J. A. Gierut
Phonological Complexity and Language Learnability
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, February 1, 2007; 16(1): 6 - 17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Child Language Teaching and TherapyHome page
S. McLeod and K. Bleile
The ICF: a framework for setting goals for children with speech impairment
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, October 1, 2004; 20(3): 199 - 219.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Child Language Teaching and TherapyHome page
L. Wolk
Intervention strategies for children who exhibit coexisting phonological and fluency disorders: a clinical note
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, February 1, 1998; 14(1): 69 - 82.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.