LSHSS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools Vol.30 11-25 January 1999.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hargrove, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Heino, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hargrove, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Heino, K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Format for Identifying Interactions Among Measures of Communication Skills

A Case Study

Patricia M. Hargrove 1
Jacquelyn Frerichs 2

Kimberli Heino 3
1 Minnesota State University, Mankato
2 Jackson County Central School District, Jackson, MN
3 Waterville-Elysian-Morristown Schools, Waterville, MN

Hargrove{at}vax1.mankato.msus.edu

A format for longitudinally tracking interactions among measures representing different domains of communication was developed in response to calls for integrative approaches to language assessment. This longitudinal case study examined measures of segmental phonology, nonsegmental phonology, and syntax/ morphology in a child with language impairment in order to illustrate the effectiveness of this format in identifying interactions. The format detected trade-offs and co-occurrences, which changed during the 6 1/2 yearsof study. The results support Crystal's (1987) "bucket" theory of language and the value of integrative approaches to assessment.

KEY WORDS: assessment, longitudinal tracking, interaction analysis, dynamic systems analysis, case standing

Submitted on January 23, 1996
Accepted on February 3, 1997


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 AJSLPHome page
L. M. Justice, R. P. Bowles, J. N. Kaderavek, T. A. Ukrainetz, S. L. Eisenberg, and R. B. Gillam
The Index of Narrative Microstructure: A Clinical Tool for Analyzing School-Age Children's Narrative Performances.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, May 1, 2006; 15(2): 177 - 191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.