LSHSS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools Vol.30 61-67 January 1999.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cole, K. N.
Right arrow Articles by Vanderstoep, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cole, K. N.
Right arrow Articles by Vanderstoep, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Influence of Language/Cognitive Profile on Discourse Intervention Outcome

Kevin N. Cole 1
Truman E. Coggins 2

Cheryl Vanderstoep 2

1 Washington Research Institute, Seattle
2 University of Washington, Seattle

kcole{at}wriedu.org

Children with communication needs are often allocated intervention services as a result of the relationship between their cognitive ability and language performance. Children with higher cognitive skills relative to language skills are considered promising candidates for language services. In contrast, children who are delayed in both cognitive and language abilities are considered poor candidates for intervention and are often excluded from services, or given a lower priority for services. This study examines the effects of intervention on one aspect of pragmatic development (discourse skills) following intervention for two groups of young children with delayed language development: one group with measured cognitive performance above language performance, and the other group with similar delays in both language and cognitive performance. Repeated measures analyses of variance indicated significant differences between groups for two of 15 measures derived from language samples. Both favored the children with equivalent delays in language and cognition. These findings do not support the notion that children with equivalent delays in cognition and language development are poor candidates for language intervention. Service delivery and policy implications are discussed.

KEY WORDS: cognitive referencing, cognitive hypothesis, discourse, eligibility, language intervention

Submitted on February 10, 1997
Accepted on May 18, 1998


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AJSLPHome page
D. F. Loeb, R. B. Gillam, L. Hoffman, J. Brandel, and J. Marquis
The Effects of Fast ForWord Language on the Phonemic Awareness and Reading Skills of School-Age Children With Language Impairments and Poor Reading Skills
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, November 1, 2009; 18(4): 376 - 387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJSLPHome page
E. Skarakis-Doyle, W. Campbell, and L. Dempsey
Identification of Children With Language Impairment: Investigating the Classification Accuracy of the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories, Level III
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, August 1, 2009; 18(3): 277 - 288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
E. Skarakis-Doyle and L. Dempsey
The Detection and Monitoring of Comprehension Errors by Preschool Children With and Without Language Impairment
J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2008; 51(5): 1227 - 1243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
G. A. Troia
Migrant Students with Limited English Proficiency: Can Fast ForWord LanguageTM Make a Di ference in Their Language Skills and Academic Achievement?
Remedial and Special Education, December 1, 2004; 25(6): 353 - 366.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Child Language Teaching and TherapyHome page
E. McCartney
Include us out? Speech and language therapists' prioritization in mainstream schools
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, June 1, 2000; 16(2): 165 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.