Computer-Based Language Assessment Software

The Effects of Presentation and Response Format

rhaaf{at}julian.uwo.ca

Nonstandard presentation and response formats are often employed by speech-language pathologists when clients are unable to perform the pointing response required of many standardized tests. However, any adaptation to test administration potentially compromises the norming standards of that test. The present study investigated the effects of computerized presentation of the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised (PPVT-R, Dunn & Dunn, 1981) Form M, using two computer-based response formats. Seventy-two normally developing children between the ages of 4:0 (years:months) and 8:11 participated in this study. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of three response conditions: (1) standard presentation -direct pointing, (2) computer presentation-trackball, and (3) computer presentation-automated scanning. Statistical analyses revealed that there were no differences in performance across the response conditions, which is consistent with the hypothesis that computerized testforms are equivalent to standard forms. Age was strongly related to increased accuracy regardless of condition. Thus, the adapted response formats of the computerized version constitute statistically equivalent forms of the PPVT-R and can be used with the published norms for this test.

KEY WORDS: standardized, assessment, modification, computer, accessibility

Submitted on July 10, 1997
Accepted on June 26, 1998

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. L. Jacobs and K. L. Coufal A Computerized Screening Instrument of Language Learnability Communication Disorders Quarterly, January 1, 2001; 22(2): 67 - 75. [Abstract] [PDF]