Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools Vol.36 62-72 January 2005. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2005/006)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrowCustom Print
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, E. C.
Right arrow Articles by Bennetto, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Young, E. C.
Right arrow Articles by Bennetto, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Delicious   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Use of Two Language Tests to Identify Pragmatic Language Problems in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders

Edna Carter Young 1
Joshua J. Diehl 2
Danielle Morris 1
Susan L. Hyman 1

Loisa Bennetto 2

1 University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
2 University of Rochester, Rochester, NY

edna_young{at}URMC.Rochester.edu

Purpose: Pragmatic language disorders (PLDs) are difficult to diagnose in a cost-effective manner, and there are few assessment tools that yield quantitative data. This investigation was designed to determine whether two formal assessment tools would differentiate PLDs in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) from controls matched on verbal IQ and language fundamentals.

Method: Thirty-four matched participants were given the Test of Pragmatic Language (TOPL; D. Phelps-Terasaki & T. Phelps-Gunn, 1992) and the Strong Narrative Assessment Procedure (SNAP; C. J. Strong, 1998).

Results: Participants with ASDs had significantly poorer scores than controls on the TOPL. On the SNAP, the children with ASDs performed similarly to controls on syntax, cohesion, story grammar, and completeness of episodes. The controls performed significantly better only on the ability to answer inferential questions.

Clinical Implications: The TOPL was effective in differentiating PLDs in children with ASDs when performance was compared to matched controls. The SNAP did not clearly differentiate language problems in these two groups. Research is needed to develop formal assessment tools that target the unique language disabilities of high-functioning individuals with ASDs.

KEY WORDS: pragmatic language disorders, pragmatic language testing, autism spectrum disorders, Test of Pragmatic Language, Strong Narrative Assessment Procedure, Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-3

Submitted on March 16, 2003
Revised on August 18, 2003
Accepted on April 23, 2004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AJSLPHome page
A. Hoffmann, M. A. Martens, R. Fox, P. Rabidoux, and R. Andridge
Pragmatic Language Assessment in Williams Syndrome: A Comparison of the Test of Pragmatic Language--2 and the Children's Communication Checklist--2
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, May 1, 2013; 22(2): 198 - 204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJSLPHome page
J. Volden and L. Phillips
Measuring Pragmatic Language in Speakers With Autism Spectrum Disorders: Comparing the Children's Communication Checklist--2 and the Test of Pragmatic Language
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, August 1, 2010; 19(3): 204 - 212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Language Learning and EducationHome page
A. M. Abdelal
Assessment and Treatment of Pragmatic Disorders: Integrating Linguistic and Neurocognitive Perspectives
Language Learning and Education, July 1, 2009; 16(2): 70 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Communication Disorders QuarterlyHome page
B. Reichow, S. Salamack, R. Paul, F. R. Volkmar, and A. Klin
Pragmatic Assessment in Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Comparison of a Standard Measure With Parent Report
Communication Disorders Quarterly, May 1, 2008; 29(3): 169 - 176.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AJSLPHome page
A. Philofsky, D. J. Fidler, and S. Hepburn
Pragmatic Language Profiles of School-Age Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders and Williams Syndrome
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, November 1, 2007; 16(4): 368 - 380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]