LSHSS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools Vol.37 104-117 April 2006. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2006/013)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dowden, P.
Right arrow Articles by Amtmann, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dowden, P.
Right arrow Articles by Amtmann, D.

Report

Survey of SLP Caseloads in Washington State Schools: Implications and Strategies for Action

Patricia Dowden
Nancy Alarcon

University of Washington, Seattle

Teresa Vollan
Snohomish Health District, Snohomish, WA

Gary D. Cumley
University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point

Carrie M. Kuehn
Dagmar Amtmann

University of Washington, Seattle

Contact author: Patricia Dowden, PhD, CCC-Sp, Assistant Clinical Professor, Speech & Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, 1417 N.E. 42nd St. Seattle, WA 98105. Email: dowden{at}u.washington.edu

PURPOSE: To document statewide and regional caseloads and to examine workload management strategies by surveying speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in Washington State public schools.

METHOD: All school SLPs who were registered with the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction were mailed a detailed survey in May, 2001 and a brief follow-up survey 1 year later.

RESULTS: Response rates were 43% (N = 431) and 47% (N = 464), respectively. Caseload findings showed a statewide mean of 59 students, with regional variation as high as 30%.

IMPLICATIONS: There was no systematic evidence that caseloads were managed through state, district, or local limits or by distributing clients on the basis of the severity of impairment or SLP experience or training. There was significant evidence, however, that clinicians with larger caseloads were more likely to have assistants and to conduct a higher proportion of group sessions than were clinicians with smaller caseloads. The authors discuss the implication of these findings for this and other states with no caseload limits and a shortage of SLPs. There is an appeal for more research using newly established measures of workload as well as a call to action to address the challenges that these findings represent.

KEY WORDS: schools, caseload, workload, overtime, augmentative




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Augmentative and Alternative CommunicationHome page
K. A. Fallon
AAC in the Schools: Current Issues and Future Directions
Augmentative and Alternative Communication, April 1, 2008; 17(1): 6 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LSHSSHome page
D. L. Edgar and L. I. Rosa-Lugo
The Critical Shortage of Speech-Language Pathologists in the Public School Setting: Features of the Work Environment That Affect Recruitment and Retention
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, January 1, 2007; 38(1): 31 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.