|
|
||||||||
Clinical Forum |
Contact author: Ann A. Tyler, PhD, University of Nevada, Reno, Speech Pathology and Audiology, Mail Stop 152, Reno, NV 89557. E-mail: anntyler{at}med.unr.edu
PURPOSE: This commentary, written in response to Alan Kamhi's paper, "Treatment Decisions for Children with SpeechSound Disorders," further considers the "what" or goal selection process of decision making with the aim of efficiencygetting the most change in the shortest time.
METHOD: My comments reflect a focus on the client values piece of the evidence-based practice (EBP) triad through validating treatment decisions for individual clients using generalization data. Such data are ideal for demonstrating change according to specific benchmarks and suggesting that treatment was responsible for this change. Consideration is also given to deficit profiles and their implications for long-term outcomes when validating the effects of treatment.
CONCLUSION: Although the abundance of evidence suggests that a variety of treatment approaches are effective for children with speechsound disorders, less is known about which are most efficient as compared to one another or for which specific children. Practitioners, however, are embracing EBP when they select a treatment by matching the research evidence with a client's profile, collect systematic data, and use those data to demonstrate that change is attributable to treatment.
KEY WORDS: EBP, treatment, generalization, speechsound disorders
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. J. Lass and M. Pannbacker The Application of Evidence-Based Practice to Nonspeech Oral Motor Treatments Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, July 1, 2008; 39(3): 408 - 421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASHA Journals | AJA | AJSLP | JSLHR | LSHSS |