LSHSS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools Vol.37 280-283 October 2006. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2006/032)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tyler, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tyler, A. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Clinical Forum

Commentary on "Treatment Decisions for Children With Speech–Sound Disorders": Revisiting the Past in EBP

Ann A. Tyler
University of Nevada, Reno

Contact author: Ann A. Tyler, PhD, University of Nevada, Reno, Speech Pathology and Audiology, Mail Stop 152, Reno, NV 89557. E-mail: anntyler{at}med.unr.edu

PURPOSE: This commentary, written in response to Alan Kamhi's paper, "Treatment Decisions for Children with Speech–Sound Disorders," further considers the "what" or goal selection process of decision making with the aim of efficiency—getting the most change in the shortest time.

METHOD: My comments reflect a focus on the client values piece of the evidence-based practice (EBP) triad through validating treatment decisions for individual clients using generalization data. Such data are ideal for demonstrating change according to specific benchmarks and suggesting that treatment was responsible for this change. Consideration is also given to deficit profiles and their implications for long-term outcomes when validating the effects of treatment.

CONCLUSION: Although the abundance of evidence suggests that a variety of treatment approaches are effective for children with speech–sound disorders, less is known about which are most efficient as compared to one another or for which specific children. Practitioners, however, are embracing EBP when they select a treatment by matching the research evidence with a client's profile, collect systematic data, and use those data to demonstrate that change is attributable to treatment.

KEY WORDS: EBP, treatment, generalization, speech–sound disorders


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
LSHSSHome page
N. J. Lass and M. Pannbacker
The Application of Evidence-Based Practice to Nonspeech Oral Motor Treatments
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, July 1, 2008; 39(3): 408 - 421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.