LSHSS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools Vol.37 298-303 October 2006. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2006/034)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ukrainetz, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ukrainetz, T. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Clinical Forum

The Implications of RTI and EBP for SLPs: Commentary on L. M. Justice

Teresa A. Ukrainetz
University of Wyoming, Laramie

Contact author: Teresa A. Ukrainetz, PhD, Division of Communication Disorders, Dept. 3311, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave, Laramie, WY 82071-3311. E-mail: tukraine{at}uwyo.edu

PURPOSE: This commentary responds to Justice's article on response to intervention (RTI) and evidence-based practice (EBP) for reading instruction. The educational changes brought about by RTI and EBP provide an opportunity as well as a challenge for speech-language pathologists (SLPs) to make fundamental changes in service delivery.

METHOD: In this article, I discuss how RTI will change who qualifies as reading disabled and who receives special reading instruction. I examine how RTI might change who qualifies and how they qualify for speech-language services. Finally, I consider what can be taken from EPB and RTI to improve speech-language service delivery.

CONCLUSION: RTI has the potential to fundamentally change regular education and its interface with special education. If SLP clinicians, researchers, and policymakers recognize the possibilities, RTI could also significantly and positively impact educational speech-language pathology.

KEY WORDS: language assessment, language intervention, reading disability


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
School-Based IssuesHome page
M. D. Fitzgerald and S. B. Driggins
A View From the Field: Early Intervening and RTI
School-Based Issues, October 1, 2008; 9(3): 88 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
School-Based IssuesHome page
K. F. Schussler
Response to Intervention: My Perspective
School-Based Issues, October 1, 2008; 9(3): 111 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LSHSSHome page
N. J. Lass and M. Pannbacker
The Application of Evidence-Based Practice to Nonspeech Oral Motor Treatments
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, July 1, 2008; 39(3): 408 - 421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.