LSHSS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools Vol.37 316-319 October 2006. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2006/036)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fey, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fey, M. E.

Clinical Forum

Commentary on "Making Evidence-Based Decisions About Child Language Intervention in Schools" by Gillam and Gillam

Marc E. Fey
University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City

Contact author: Marc E. Fey, KUMC, Department of hearing and Speech, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS 66160-7605. E-mail: mfey{at}kumc.edu

PURPOSE: This paper is a personal reaction to Gillam and Gillam's treatise on evidence-based decision making in schools. This evaluation focuses principally on the costs and benefits of clinicians' search for external evidence, potential problems associated with efforts to grade that evidence, and the integration of this evidence with "internal" evidence related to specific children and their families, clinician preferences and experience, and the school setting.

METHOD: Descriptive methods (that are not evidence-based) are used to evaluate critically Gillam and Gillam's proposals on the implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP) in schools.

CONCLUSION: Early efforts to implement the plan for EBP illustrated by Gillam and Gillam are likely to be difficult, forcing clinicians to be flexible and patient. Nevertheless, if the plan is followed, it will result ultimately in improved speech-language pathology services in the schools and improved clinical research to support those services.

KEY WORDS: evidence-based practice, efficiency, effectiveness, speech-language intervention




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
LSHSSHome page
N. J. Lass and M. Pannbacker
The Application of Evidence-Based Practice to Nonspeech Oral Motor Treatments
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, July 1, 2008; 39(3): 408 - 421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LSHSSHome page
T. Brackenbury, E. Burroughs, and L. E. Hewitt
A Qualitative Examination of Current Guidelines for Evidence-Based Practice in Child Language Intervention
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, January 1, 2008; 39(1): 78 - 88.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LSHSSHome page
F. M. Cirrin and R. B. Gillam
Language Intervention Practices for School-Age Children With Spoken Language Disorders: A Systematic Review
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, January 1, 2008; 39(1): S110 - S137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.