|
|
||||||||
Clinical Forum |
Contact author: Alan Kamhi, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, 300 Ferguson, UNCG, Greensboro, NC 27402. E-mail: agkamhi{at}uncg.edu
PURPOSE: In this afterward, I will offer some final thoughts on this clinical forum by considering a central question of EBPhow experimental validation is definedto illustrate the difficulty involved in implementing EBP.
METHOD: The comments draw on critical reviews I have received on my article in this forum and conversations I have had with professional colleagues about EBP.
CONCLUSION: Like most scientific constructs, EBP is open to different interpretations. At their worst, these differences have the potential to polarize clinical practice. The hope, however, as Kent and Fey have expressed, is that articles and commentaries such as these will serve as the basis for discussion and even argument among clinicians and researchers as we attempt to define a philosophy and implementation of EBP suited to our profession.
KEY WORDS: evidence-based practice
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. J. Lass and M. Pannbacker The Application of Evidence-Based Practice to Nonspeech Oral Motor Treatments Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, July 1, 2008; 39(3): 408 - 421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASHA Journals | AJA | AJSLP | JSLHR | LSHSS |