LSHSS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools Vol.40 341-351 July 2009. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2008/08-0009)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CEUs available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kirk, C.
Right arrow Articles by Gillon, G. T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kirk, C.
Right arrow Articles by Gillon, G. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Clinical Forum

Integrated Morphological Awareness Intervention as a Tool for Improving Literacy

Cecilia Kirk
University of Canterbury, New Zealand and University of Oregon, Eugene

Gail T. Gillon
University of Canterbury, New Zealand

Contact author: Cecilia Kirk, Department of Special Education and Clinical Services, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403. E-mail: ceciliak{at}uoregon.edu.

Purpose: This study evaluated the effects of an intervention program aimed to improve reading and spelling ability through instruction in morphological awareness together with other forms of linguistic awareness, including knowledge of phonology, orthography, syntax, and semantics.

Method: Sixteen children aged between 8;07 (years;months) and 11;01 who demonstrated specific spelling difficulties were randomly assigned to either an experimental or a control group. Participants received an average of 19.4 sessions of intervention that focused on increasing awareness of the morphological structure of words, with particular attention to the orthographic rules that apply when suffixes are added to the base word.

Results: Participants in the experimental group made significantly greater gains in reading and spelling accuracy than those in the control group on both experimental and standardized measures of reading and spelling. The results also show that participants were able to generalize to new words what they had learned in the intervention sessions.

Conclusion: Practitioners should consider the likely benefits of literacy intervention that focuses on developing morphological awareness in conjunction with other types of linguistic awareness.

KEY WORDS: literacy intervention, morphological awareness, linguistic awareness, spelling, reading


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
LSHSSHome page
L. Green
Morphology and Literacy: Getting Our Heads in the Game
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, July 1, 2009; 40(3): 283 - 285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.